Demo on Google Maps, AdWords Soon?

I’ve always said that once geotargeting improves it becomes demographic targeting. Right now, absent WiFi or cell triangulation, the primary medium for geotargeting is reverse IP lookups, which are often correct but not geographically precise. Improvements are on their way from a variety of sources including 1020/Placecast, Urban Mapping (geomods) and others.

Recently Google made its AdWords geotargeting interface more map-centric and intuitive:

AdWords interface

Poking around on Google Maps this past weekend, I discovered that someone had enabled the presentation of demographic data on Google Maps (as a Mapplet). Census/demographic data on maps has long been available for enterprises from a number of companies. And beyond the fact that geotargeting remains imprecise, I’ve never understood why this data isn’t available for AdWords and Panama, for example. (MSFT adCenter, Google and Yahoo offer demo targeting in other ways.)

So take a look and you’ll see the immediate possibilities for transforming geotargeting into demographic targeting.

Age (18-21):

Age

Ethnic group (Asian):

Ethnic group

Household size/composition (one woman):

Household

Very interesting in my opinion.

All this assumes that the census data are accurate, but it’s a compelling new wrinkle and step forward for geotargeting if targeting itself can be improved.

12 Responses to “Demo on Google Maps, AdWords Soon?”

  1. ian Says:

    it’s very interesting and makes sense–interactive marketing will follow the path of direct marketing. but there’s one significant point that remains unchanged…if geo-IP is all that is used to determine a user’s location, hyper/granular/demo targeting is completely moot as it is all predicated on the user’s IP, which is chock full of holes: http://blog.urbanmapping.com/articles/2007/04/25/why-geotargeting-sucks

  2. cohn Says:

    GeoDemographic Targeting?

    I too found the new Adwords “click to target a location” tool much easier to use. Its more intuitive and user friendly than the previous “tool”.

  3. Greg Sterling Says:

    Yes. Ian’s generally correct about limitations of current methodologies in use. But improvements are coming.

  4. ian Says:

    Tim- don’t be fooled by a UI change/enhancement–it doesn’t necessarily translate to better geotargeting since the underlying IP may not be known below the level of a state or city.

  5. cohn Says:

    Thanks Ian… I too have had issues with the accuracy of IP based mapping and targeting.

    I have ran campaigns in 25-50 markets with multiple store locations and trade area restrictions.

    With feet on the street we found ads for Store #1 in Store 2’s area and so on. Smaller maps produced ever larger margins of error.

    After thinking about it for a while, I concluded large blocks of IP addresses at the phone and cable companies (small businesses and residences) aren’t as predictably located and thus targeted as corporate servers.

    The above example doesn’t include satellite based internet services which almost always
    resolve to a handful of their locations.

  6. Anne Bezancon Says:

    cohn, good news, we can help solve your problem.
    IP look-up is inherently a weak association of the virtual world with the real world, since it was not build for that purpose. Better spatial targeting is predicated on the ability to position the user on the planet (which in itself is hard to do consistently), but that is not always providing enough meaning to deliver significantly more relevant messages, let alone the cost-effectiveness of the production process of localized ads. We are using layers of other information about that location at that time to create semantics of “Place”. From there we can define audiences more precisely and deliver information that is more relevant to users both in place and time dimensions. Shameless plug: 100% customer return…

  7. Google’s Local Ad Targeting Strategies « Screenwerk Says:

    […] lunch, I made the argument to Carter that with zip-level (or neighborhood-level) targeting, layering US Census data on top of Google’s map-based AdWords interface, turns it into demographic targeting. The challenge for Google is the company would have to add […]

  8. Google AdPlanner: Demos and Traffic « Screenwerk Says:

    […] As I’ve tried to argue, when local targeting improves (by zip, neighborhood) and US Census and other information are layered on top of that, you have a potentially much more powerful demographic targeting tool: […]

  9. The Future of Local — Revisited « Screenwerk Says:

    […] at the zip or neighborhood level, on a national scale. Hopefully I’m making myself clear. (I wrote about this […]

  10. Shila Blakeley Says:

    Lots of of bloggers not too pleased with this new iPad.There was 2 much hype about it and alot people got turned off.Thing is, I for one see great deal of the awesome potential of the gizmo. Third-party soft for making tunes, games, papers and magazine and FFS books, tons of cool stuff, but IMHO they just didn’t really sell it very well (aside from the books). It looks rather unfinished

  11. adwords Says:

    adwords…

    […]Demo on Google Maps, AdWords Soon? « Screenwerk[…]…

  12. knowagoodmovie Says:

    knowagoodmovie…

    […]Demo on Google Maps, AdWords Soon? « Screenwerk[…]…

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: