Google Checkout (Late Posting)

Google Checkout

I was on a short two-day vacation (more on that later) when Google Checkout was released last week. Lots has already been written and said and much remains to be seen. But I believe, like most Google initiatives these days, it’s not about any single objective — Google is always trying to kill more than one bird.

So what is Google Checkout ultimately about? It’s about rewarding current AdWords advertisers and attracting new ones. It’s about building stronger and deeper relationships with merchants and, especially, consumers. It’s also potentially about new revenues (we’ll see). And, assuming Google is to be believed, it’s NOT about using consumer purchase data to tailor search results or to market to consumers in other ways. It’s also apparently not tied into Google Analytics.

As Om Malik points out, it may be also about anticipated future migration to a CPA model. (I think CPA is on the menu as an intended “advertising” option, but not thought of as a PPC replacement at Google). Early last year I asked whether click fraud would accelerate the further development and mainstreaming of alternatives to PPC (they’ve always existed of course). Now we are seeing several developments that suggest that some of these other models will gain popularity and take hold.

My comment to many of the reporters with whom I spoke last week was that the key for Google is to establish trust and build consumer acceptance and adoption right out of the gate. I think the entire system hinges directly on this. And part of that will be marketing and promotion of the system — something that Google has been loathe to do with any sustained focus for any of its recently introduced products.

This Business Week article is highly critical of Google’s non-search initiatives and uses Hitwise data to argue that they’re mostly flops. Here’s an interesting statement from the article attributed to Marissa Mayer of Google:

[U]p to 60% to 80% of Google’s products may eventually crash and burn. But the idea, she says, is to encourage risk-taking and let surviving products truly thrive. “We anticipate that we’re going to throw out a lot of products,” says Mayer. “But [people] will remember the ones that really matter and the ones that have a lot of user potential.”

From what little I know of the company’s culture, this statement reflects a quasi-Darwinian ethos prevalent at Google. I’m using informed speculation when I say that behind their non-promotion of products is something like a “survival of the fittest” notion. The products that are good will find their audience and survive (or stick on the refrigerator), while others (60% to 80% according to Google’s Mayer) will fail (or fall to the floor).

If I’m right about that assumption regarding the “Darwinian” philosophy – remember the template is Google search, which grew and thrived without any marketing — it’s an element of the culture that may need to change.

If Google really wants consumers and merchants to use Checkout, it probably will have to do some good old fashioned marketing or at least consistent promotion on Without that, Checkout may not get the notice and potential adoption it otherwise would — and could wind up falling into that 60% to 80% abyss.

But I think there’s too much at stake here to throw the baby into the pool and see if it can swim on its own.


11 Responses to “Google Checkout (Late Posting)”

  1. AhmedF Says:

    I have to say, the Hitwise data is interesting, but also misleading. There is no way that a new app (such as GMail) could simply become more dominant than Hotmail or Yahoo Mail overnight. What is striking is how fast it *has* grown, especially when you consider something like email, which has a lot of inertia in keeping your existing email.

  2. Peter Caputa Says:

    The whole darwinian thing is interesting, albeit a retarded product development philosophy. I am all about encouraging failure. However, iterative product development is crucial. Throwing away what isn’t used and testing new features should be done on every product. Testing ways to market them and integrate them are key too. If yahoo didn’t cross promote and integrate its products, it’d be pretty ridiculous.

  3. xtranewfxtrdr Says:


    Just wondering if anyone if using this program and seeing results?

    [url=]FX Trading Platform[/url]



  4. ememjammer Says:

    So I was off work and surfing and found this place and thought I would join up. I don’t have much more to say right now except I need to start reading some of the older posts to get up to speed before I can start posting.


  5. texas holdem gratis spielen Says:

    texas holdem gratis spielen…

    Possibly poker strategy cd poker bonus…

  6. HSCharles Says:

    I have a flash website
    i’m looking for the script who makes google adsense on flash.
    how can i get it?

  7. Mark Says:

    ACCORDING TO ME , Google Checkout will brings more customers and will allows them to buy (from you) with a single login. This will make the process more fast & convenient . This system will definitely increase the sales & protect from fraud.

  8. temaGanty Says: Free Lifetime Account
    Free Lifetime Account for

  9. feedgebrodox Says: rio gramde jewelry suppliers
    card day father
    ifc credit

  10. feedgebrodok Says: 22ct gold jewelry
    calculate earned income credit
    associates credit card midfirst bank

  11. Landolite Says:

    Steal the craze VIAGRA
    You commitment not be dissapointed
    Get under way at freedom pills in spite of the gain of everybody
    Pick up joined at this terribly moment!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: