Barry Schwartz has a long post on SEL, to which I’ve added a privacy related addendum, about the introduction of what Google is calling “interest-based targeting.” It’s BT with an interesting twist: consumers can opt-out and/or indicate preferences that impact the ads seen.
Here’s the explanatory companion video:
There’s an apparent and potentially growing contradiction between consumer attitudes toward BT and the increasing adoption of it by online advertisers and publishers. As one example, Burst Media recently found (n=4,000 US adults):
- Over 60% of respondents are aware of the tracking, collecting and sharing of information that occurs as a result of online activities.
- Respondents do not see value in ads targeted to them based on their web surfing behavior – even if it improves their web surfing experience
Burst also found that “based strictly on a description – advertisements more relevant to interest – only one-in-five (23.2%) respondents would not mind if non-personally identifiable information was collected if ads were better targeted.”
Google’s “preferences” approach — allowing people to specify areas of interest — together with the ability to opt out of targeting may offer a way to bridge the privacy divide.
What do you think?
As an indication of how important and sensitive this is, see not one, not two but all three Google blog posts:

March 11, 2009 at 1:43 pm |
[...] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/technology/internet/11google.htmlhttp://gesterling.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/ [...]
March 11, 2009 at 1:56 pm |
[...] http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/ This entry was written by Michael, posted on March 11, 2009 at 6:41 am, filed under [...]
March 11, 2009 at 5:20 pm |
[...] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/technology/internet/11google.html http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/ [...]
March 11, 2009 at 6:19 pm |
can you say disintermediation? SEMs will have to find more value to offer advertisers. Granted this doesn’t mean SEMs are going out of business, but it does mean simply marking up Google’s BT tools and passing along costs ain’t gonna cut it
March 12, 2009 at 1:33 pm |
спасибо за статью… добавил в ридер
March 14, 2009 at 7:07 am |
I am a publisher and got the email about this. Nobody else thinks the cookies that track users across many domains are not only a privacy concern but a security issue? I did not like the explanations of the ‘DoubleClick DART cookie’, and the new requirements that I would have had to put into my site’s privacy policy were simply unacceptable. I have removed AdSense.
Please see my last post if you are interested in details about the new publisher requirements and how this will affect users, including the opt out link.