ZocDoc: One Doc at a Time
After being aware of ZocDoc since launch I finally got a chance to talk to founders Cyrus Massoumi and Oliver Kharraz, MD. They pitched it as “Open Table for healthcare.”
Other than general, horizontal review sites and parent/mom sites (e.g., Baby Center) the only other site I could think of that solicits reviews of doctors is Steve Case’s Revolution Health. However, there are few actual reviews on the site that I could find.
ZocDoc by contrast only solicits reviews from actual patients after they’ve booked appointments through the site. I was told by Kharraz that 25% of first-time patients do write reviews, which is a much-better-than-average figure for user-generated content sites.
In one sense, ZocDoc competes with HourTown, Booking Angel, Libersy and Genbook because it provides online booking. It charges a fee when bookings are made. However, it’s really competing with other health sites and consumers destination sites that offer recommendations for health care providers. But because of its methodology it prevents gaming — doctors and their families are unable to write reviews — and brings a potentially higher level of trust to its ratings.
Also, by combining reviews with online booking, ZocDoc has removed a potential barrier for first-time patients in doing online appointments. That is because, in absence of quality indicators, some first-time patients might want to have a phone conversation before committing to an appointment. In fact Massoumi told me that they had an 800 number and a call center when the site launched but have since removed it given how few people were using it relative to online bookings.
Massoumi and Kharraz are only focused on Manhattan and won’t say when they’re going to roll out more broadly. They want to get that market right before going to others, which is the right strategy.
May 6, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Do you think doctor ratings will ever be a means as to how most people pick a doctor. The problem I have with this vs. other ratings and review categories (e.g. restaurants, hotels, etc) is I would argue 99% of the doctor going public does not have the knowledge base necessary to properly gauge a dr’s performance. Sure, I can tell if they are nice, or treated me well, or had a short wait, but I have no idea if they ran the right tests or treated me in the most appropriate manner b/c for the most part I know nothing about diagnostic medicine. Thus, more important reviews that I think people would consider are from either other doctors or people/publications with some medical knowledge.
May 6, 2008 at 8:31 pm
You’re right that the pubic lacks expert knowledge but this service is nonetheless valuable. Many drs. are arrogant SOBs and many have no people skills and treat their patients like commodities. Communication skills, personality and related “people skills” are relevant to a determination of whether to see a dr. Also people can expose whether drs. explained procedures, we’re interested in alternatives to invasive treatments, etc.
Right now there’s almost no information out there for the public and many people make choices based on very little information. So anything is helpful.
Implied in your comment is the idea that docs might be chosen for the wrong reasons. But I don’t think anyone will confuse “short wait” or “nice receptionist” with competent dr. performance.
May 6, 2008 at 9:16 pm
I would argue tho that even incompetent dr’s could appear quite competent to the lay person and, in a variety of specialties, the consumer would never know the difference in terms of actual result if treated by someone totally incompetent. the same can’t be said regarding a restaurant or hotel. After all, pretty much anyone can tell if food is horrific or his/her hotel room is dirty. I guess what I am saying is I think consumer reviews for Docs could help weed out the really terrible ones, however, for the other 99% I’m not sure how much value consumer reviews add in this category. I do like the booking engine tho. Anything that can help me make things easier and not talk to a person is good by me
May 6, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Hard to please.