BusinessWeek on Yelp

BusinessWeek’s Sarah Lacy, of SWSX-Mark Zuckerberg interview infamy, profiles Yelp: “Yelp is one of the few companies that has tried to tap the elusive local market and actually succeeded.” What she means is startups, of course.
An excerpt:
Another contrast between Yelp and other consumer-Web startups: Stoppelman insisted on building his own ad sales force from day one. That lifted Yelp’s costs dramatically, compared with peers that outsource ad sales to the likes of Google, Microsoft, or Federated Media. But Stoppelman knew he couldn’t sell to local businesses using computers and mathematical models à la Google. He’d have to do it the old-fashioned way, manning the phones, calling one local business at a time.
This is the kind of “patience” that’s required to succeed in local, although it requires enormous “heavy lifting.” Yelp’s ad sales success is driven by its consumer success. And that success is a mixture of intuition, careful thinking, hard work and luck.
Yelp is now regarded as the model in local by many. It didn’t invent community or the combination of reviews and local by any means but it has mixed those elements very successfully — obviously. There are skeptics who believe — I get these comments from time to time — that the site only has appeal in a few top DMAs and in limited numbers of categories.
Now that Yelp has grown to this point, one thing that the site might want to do is develop the ability to sort by “network.” This is something that Loladex has done on Facebook and it’s potentially valuable as a way to filter in markets where there are too many listings or reviews. Of course it only works if there’s a critical mass of participation on the site.
On a somewhat controversial note, Google recently added a “search within” search box for site search. Here’s what it looks like for Yelp:
Do you think Yelp (or any site owner) benefits, is harmed in some way or should care at all?

April 8, 2008 at 1:12 pm
In terms of creating or protecting a brand they, and others, will be harmed since Google will be the search entry point and not their own site.
April 8, 2008 at 1:20 pm
I would agree with that general statement. However, Yelp’s brand strength is strong enough in certain markets that people will go there directly. However, if Google or its toolbar is used for navigation to do so, there may be some “dilution.”
April 8, 2008 at 2:09 pm
Google creating this search is just a grab for more pageviews - I absolutely hate it.
April 8, 2008 at 2:11 pm
They took the ads off the secondary pages after initially showing them, because of the outcry.
April 8, 2008 at 2:23 pm
This is disconcerting: http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006157&src=article1_newsltr
April 8, 2008 at 2:24 pm
Yes, just looked at that. The paradox of the Internet is that it’s arguably the most “democratic” medium but it’s becoming an oligarchy of sorts with lots of serfs — to sort of mix metaphors.
April 8, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Yelp is a good product, and there’s no doubt it’s the mindshare leader in local these days. I admire it. But the story doesn’t come close to backing up this thesis:
>>>
Yelp’s real Web 2.0 bragging right is its business model
<<<
Lacy didn’t cite any numbers to support this claim — how many advertisers Yelp has, or how much advertising revenue, or whether it’s profitable now, or will be anytime soon.
Yelp has a lot of traffic, many satisfied users, and a bunch of money in the bank. That’s a big achievement, and a great place to be. But the swooning vibe of Lacy’s piece demands a bit more than that, I think.
Plus I’m dubious of this idea that Yelp is “off the business-press radar.” We all should have such a publicity problem.
April 8, 2008 at 3:47 pm
To add briefly to Laurence’s comment, Yelp has bitten off two big challenges, simultaneously building a consumer facing product and an ad sales force. They’ve clearly had impressive success on the consumer side, but the jury must remain out on the wisdom of building a costly internal sales force that would appear to sell one product in a fragmented market.