<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Corp. Says &#8216;No&#8217; to Deal with Yahoo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/news-corp-says-no-to-deal-with-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/news-corp-says-no-to-deal-with-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Greg Sterling's Thoughts on Online and Offline Media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Tadie</title>
		<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/news-corp-says-no-to-deal-with-yahoo/#comment-129900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Tadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gesterling.wordpress.com/?p=3139#comment-129900</guid>
		<description>Whew...at least with MS/Y!, we have a chance at search duopoly...at least a few marketing forces to drive innovation and cost efficiencies...rather than an unquestionable monopoly.

From an SEM/SEO perspective, we all better get busy aggregating buckets on non core search inventory together.  From a tonnage perspective, not far from a 1-trick pony.

We used to have "brands" to make up a network buy....now we need vid, audio, mobile, bandwidth, etc to play catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew&#8230;at least with MS/Y!, we have a chance at search duopoly&#8230;at least a few marketing forces to drive innovation and cost efficiencies&#8230;rather than an unquestionable monopoly.</p>
<p>From an SEM/SEO perspective, we all better get busy aggregating buckets on non core search inventory together.  From a tonnage perspective, not far from a 1-trick pony.</p>
<p>We used to have &#8220;brands&#8221; to make up a network buy&#8230;.now we need vid, audio, mobile, bandwidth, etc to play catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saskatoon Website Design Tip - Is Yahoo!s Destiny ?Inevitable??</title>
		<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/news-corp-says-no-to-deal-with-yahoo/#comment-129889</link>
		<dc:creator>Saskatoon Website Design Tip - Is Yahoo!s Destiny ?Inevitable??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gesterling.wordpress.com/?p=3139#comment-129889</guid>
		<description>[...] Murdoch isn&#8217;t interested in Yahoo! To Screenwerk, that means Yahoo! is destined to become a part of Microsoft: This probably means that they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Murdoch isn&#8217;t interested in Yahoo! To Screenwerk, that means Yahoo! is destined to become a part of Microsoft: This probably means that they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Is Yahoo!s Destiny &#8216;Inevitable&#8217;? Search Engine Optimization Journal</title>
		<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/news-corp-says-no-to-deal-with-yahoo/#comment-129883</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Is Yahoo!s Destiny &#8216;Inevitable&#8217;? Search Engine Optimization Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gesterling.wordpress.com/?p=3139#comment-129883</guid>
		<description>[...] Murdoch isn&#8217;t interested in Yahoo! To Screenwerk, that means Yahoo! is destined to become a part of Microsoft: This probably means that they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Murdoch isn&#8217;t interested in Yahoo! To Screenwerk, that means Yahoo! is destined to become a part of Microsoft: This probably means that they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From the Pipeline - 3.10.08 &#124; WinExtra</title>
		<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/news-corp-says-no-to-deal-with-yahoo/#comment-129874</link>
		<dc:creator>From the Pipeline - 3.10.08 &#124; WinExtra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gesterling.wordpress.com/?p=3139#comment-129874</guid>
		<description>[...] News Corp. Says &#8216;No&#8217; to Deal with Yahoo! :: Screenwerk - one of the many blogs covering the fact that NewsCorp is bailing out on the white knight routine when it comes to the Yahoo and Microsoft takeover talks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News Corp. Says &#8216;No&#8217; to Deal with Yahoo! :: Screenwerk - one of the many blogs covering the fact that NewsCorp is bailing out on the white knight routine when it comes to the Yahoo and Microsoft takeover talks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
