<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint Teams with MSFT for Mobile-Local Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/</link>
	<description>Greg Sterling's Thoughts on Online and Offline Media</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2006 November 29 &#171; Screenwerk</title>
		<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/#comment-19287</link>
		<dc:creator>2006 November 29 &#171; Screenwerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/#comment-19287</guid>
		<description>[...] InfoSpace is making FindIt free for 60-days to encourage consumers to download and use it. Here&#8217;s the release. I used FindIt and it&#8217;s a good application (although I have some criticisms of course). The problem is that it has little visibility in the market. InfoSpace&#8217;s brand is not anywhere near as strong as Google, Yahoo! or the carriers and Sprint (one of InfoSpace&#8217;s FindIt partners) just did a big deal with MSFT. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] InfoSpace is making FindIt free for 60-days to encourage consumers to download and use it. Here&#8217;s the release. I used FindIt and it&#8217;s a good application (although I have some criticisms of course). The problem is that it has little visibility in the market. InfoSpace&#8217;s brand is not anywhere near as strong as Google, Yahoo! or the carriers and Sprint (one of InfoSpace&#8217;s FindIt partners) just did a big deal with MSFT. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google &#38; Yahoo Compete for Mobile Search Market</title>
		<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/#comment-17427</link>
		<dc:creator>Google &#38; Yahoo Compete for Mobile Search Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/#comment-17427</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothwithstanding Sprint&#8217;s deal with Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! are in arguably the strongest positions to capture search usage on mobile devices (which is why Sprint did the deal). Having an e-mail relationship with a user &#8212; unless text and mobile IM completely take over &#8212; is an advantage (yes, MSFT has plenty of mobile e-mail relationships it can leverage). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothwithstanding Sprint&rsquo;s deal with Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! are in arguably the strongest positions to capture search usage on mobile devices (which is why Sprint did the deal). Having an e-mail relationship with a user &#8212; unless text and mobile IM completely take over &#8212; is an advantage (yes, MSFT has plenty of mobile e-mail relationships it can leverage). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Someone Disrupt Google in Mobile? &#171; Screenwerk</title>
		<link>http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/#comment-17401</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Someone Disrupt Google in Mobile? &#171; Screenwerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gesterling.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/sprint-msft-for-mobile-local-search/#comment-17401</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothwithstanding Sprint&#8217;s deal with Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! are in arguably the strongest positions to capture search usage on mobile devices (which is why Sprint did the deal). Having an e-mail relationship with a user &#8212; unless text and mobile IM completely take over &#8212; is an advantage (yes, MSFT has plenty of email relationships it can leverage). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothwithstanding Sprint&#8217;s deal with Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! are in arguably the strongest positions to capture search usage on mobile devices (which is why Sprint did the deal). Having an e-mail relationship with a user &#8212; unless text and mobile IM completely take over &#8212; is an advantage (yes, MSFT has plenty of email relationships it can leverage). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
